This year, there are and will be a number of concerning labor actions that we must deal with. As of this writing, actors and screenwriters are on a full strike, and the United Auto Workers appear to be headed toward a U.S. shutdown. S. domestic auto manufacturing at a time when the auto industry is severely struggling. Additionally, employees in the airline industry are set to go on strike.
AI and the enormous pay gaps between CEOs and other workers are mentioned as significant contributing factors to the potential catastrophic effects of these strikes on a national scale.
One defense against this form of employee collective action ought to be human resources (HR). Nevertheless, rather than prioritizing employee care, it has operated for years more as a compliance organization designed to hide executive errors.
Fair remuneration, work/life balance, and improving workplace environments within businesses could all be greatly enhanced by AI. Yet, rather than being portrayed as a help, AI is far too frequently presented as a threat to workers.
Let’s discuss how AI might enhance executive decision-making and employee-employer relations. Finally, let’s wrap up with my Product of the Week, which is a brand-new portable gaming system from Lenovo that runs on AMD.
Accepting IBM’s AI idea
Businesses aiming to use AI should take this idea seriously as IBM has been vocal about using the technology to augment rather than replace workers.
Consider the writers’ and actors’ strike. The film industry has recently seen a number of extremely costly failures. The actors were not at fault for these; in fact, although the writers could be held accountable, the real culprits were frequently studio decisions that altered the scripts or directors who didn’t seem to grasp the subject matter.
Executives frequently make poor choices for a variety of reasons. Frequently, this is because they see it as a power play to emphasize their authority over someone who is better suited to make the decision. Reducing the pressure to replace actors and writers with artificial intelligence could be achieved by more effectively ensuring the success of films and TV shows.
Films: Poor vs. Alright
The issue, in my opinion, is that the studios have forgotten that three things are necessary for a successful film: high-quality content, a precise and effective marketing campaign, and fan involvement prior to the film’s release. This is evident in some of the most recent failures, such as “Shazam! Fury of the Gods,” “The Little Mermaid,” “The Flash,” “Black Adam,” and “Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves.”.
“Shazam!”Furiy of the Gods” ought to have been a television series; it seemed to have lost all of its charm. Given how well-liked that plot is, Shazam and Superman ought to have faced off against Black Adam.
The latest “Wild Wild West” film pushed diversity into an already non-diverse plot and alienated fans in the process. “The Little Mermaid” attempted to celebrate diversity by reiterating the errors of the first “Ghostbusters” remake. Neither movie did a great job of embracing the classic plots, which didn’t help.
You no longer have the core group of D&D enthusiasts required to propel “Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves,” a movie that I truly liked, to success.
The fact that Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox, an animated film that followed a similar plot line and was successful, made “The Flash”‘s failure all the more frustrating. The plot would have been much better if they had performed that live rather than the disorganized mess they ended up with.
All of that is in contrast to “Barbie” and “Oppenheimer.”. “Barbie” was able to effectively highlight diversity and women’s rights by crafting a thoughtfully crafted narrative that honors the past of the lead character while incorporating the message without offending ardent Barbie fans. “Oppenheimer” was a great story with historical significance that was brilliantly marketed, even though it shouldn’t have succeeded because it’s an old subject.
Because acting is often a key component of a film’s success, replacing writers and actors with AI could be more detrimental to successful films than beneficial.
But applying AI to failed films would not have raised the chances of success; rather, it would have merely decreased financial losses. In the event that you take marketing expenses into account, the risk of employing an automated process such as AI is that you end up making a lot more unsuccessful films, losing less money overall but more on each one.
Automobile
Let’s consider Tesla and electric vehicles. When I had a meeting with a former Ford CEO years ago, I told him that Tesla was going to eat his lunch if he didn’t understand what the company was doing. So that customers would enjoy driving an electric car, Tesla created a no-compromise vehicle and established a charging network. Teslas were not created as gas-powered vehicles with electric motors; rather, they were designed from the ground up.
You. S. Car manufacturers viewed Tesla’s actions as optional, despite the fact that they were “all of the above.”. Thus, none of the automakers have been as successful as Tesla, despite the fact that several of their designs have been more eye-catching and many have had better build quality. The exception is China, where the government is more in favor of the trend.
The automakers failed to follow the car companies’ own, obvious formula, which had nothing to do with the workers. Similar to the film industry, low-quality or excessively expensive labor was not the main issue. It had to do with making poor choices regarding the creation of a competitive solution.
AI-Powered Decision Assistance
Therefore, the best use of AI at first should not be to replace labor, but rather to enhance decision-making so that fewer poor decisions are made by those who make them. Using the can-do, large-scale simulations that AI and the metaverse provide, you can also model past good and bad decisions and use AI to help you take the successful path rather than one filled with mistakes.
It shouldn’t be difficult to make films that people want to watch or automobiles that people want to purchase. AI can greatly accelerate the time-to-market for new designs by eliminating many of the laborious steps involved in creating a better representation of the final product, such as creating storyboards and clay models. You can even model the buyer with AI.
Automating production won’t solve the issue of poor decision-making; instead, it will exacerbate it since it will produce even more subpar outcomes. First things first, you must improve the decision-making process. Then, you should approach cost savings by cutting out unnecessary expenses rather than getting rid of resources that might later prove to be essential.
Conclusion: The Attacks Are Not Correct
The two U. S. The movie and auto industries are having difficulties. Without addressing the underlying issue—bad decisions leading to unsuccessful product markets, not compensation—the strikes are likely to be the reason for one or more of these companies’ demise.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve decision-making processes. By doing so, it can augment current workforce capabilities rather than replace them, leading to increased productivity and a higher success rate.
AI should be used by businesses to assist line employees in getting rid of the less enjoyable parts of their work, like compliance paperwork, rewrites, and reshoots. as opposed to hiring new employees. You may build stronger bonds and support the long-term survival of your business by demonstrating empathy and compassion for both clients and staff.
Additionally, I would contend that CEO and line pay need to be rebalanced, but that is a discussion for another day. As of right now, AI works best when it comes to supplementing human performance rather than replacing it. In particular, it can assist executives in consistently making better decisions and successfully avoiding mistakes.
The Lenovo Legion Go.
With the Sony PlayStation and Microsoft Xbox, AMD is the preferred supplier in the specialized gaming market. Hence, it makes sense that Lenovo selected AMD as the supplier for the Legion Go, a revolutionary handheld gaming platform.
Currently, smartphones account for more than half of the gaming market, whereas PC gaming only makes up about 25% of the total. This suggests that one of PC gaming’s drawbacks is its immobility.
Although most PC gamers I know choose not to use a keyboard and mouse, many games do support game controllers. Due to the keyboard’s and particularly the mouse’s limitations on where you can play, gaming while on the go is practically impossible.
With its ten mappable buttons and modular handheld controls, the gaming-focused Lenovo Legion Go is a Windows 11 handheld computer that doesn’t leave you missing the extra features of a keyboard.
With an expected battery life of more than five hours and the ability to charge to 70% capacity in as little as thirty minutes, the 8-inch screen boasts 500 nits of brightness for outdoor viewing.
The gadget is a little bulky, which is necessary to dissipate the amount of heat a gaming rig generates, but many people will find that adds to its sense of luxury and substance.
For years, Lenovo has been producing gaming laptops, even though this is a first-generation device. Since the launcher—which controls how games and apps load and switch between—is primarily at fault, this device represents a significant risk. The risk to being a first adopter is low because that will be patched and updated over time without requiring a replacement device.
This might be the ideal present for the PC gamer who wishes to be more mobile as Christmas approaches.
Lenovo also unveiled Legion Glasses, a brand-new head-mounted consumer display.
In my opinion, there is a chance to combine the two gadgets to create a gaming experience that is both portable and unrivaled in the market for big screens. We’ll see.
For the time being, the Lenovo Legion Go handheld gaming device, which will go on sale in October for a starting price.